Hudud: What I hope is Anwar's Stand

In Lundang, Kelantan, UMNO through Khairy Jamaluddin originally thought that Husam Musa was stirring the strong Muslim sentiment in the Kuala Terengganu by-election to his benefit by advocating that Hudud shall be implemented by PAS should Pakatan Rakyat take over the federal government. UMNO was all very defensive at this point. Then UMNO realised and pointed this out to MCA, MIC and Gerakan and decided to use the issue to gain mileage against Pakatan Rakyat in the same by-elections.

It is not hard to decipher. UMNO cannot complain against Hudud much because they are Muslims; and being Muslims they cannot 'bantai' Hudud that much, so they decided to send their 'attack dogs' to do their dirty work - namely MCA, Gerakan and MIC. That's right, they are DOGS - the same label that that shoe-throwing Iraqi shouted against George W Bush. Shame on you UMNO, using MCA, Gerakan and MIC (again) as brainless puppets regurgitating your own voices and thoughts.

These three stooges does not understand Islam or Hudud, that is why they rely on UMNO to supply them with what to say, and afterwards MCA, Gerakan and MIC pathetically and predictably go and bark like mad, like dogs.

Anyway, Hudud shall not apply to those who have not broken the law. So why are we being so sensitive to the rights of the convict? It is not like they are being unfairly treated. They shall be allowed proper legal representation and rights normally given to an accused under the law. They will not be incarcerated without trial like the ISA. So Islam is against ISA. (I would like those so-called Malay/Muslims in Pulau Pinang to read this carefully). ISLAM IS AGAINST ISA!

For the Muslims, are we saying that Allah does not know how to create laws? or that we are better at creating laws than Allah? In saying that we are Muslims, it means that we submit and we obey to Allah and his laws. Are we disputing the fact that the Holy Qur'an is untouched by mortals? or that the Holy Qur'an is only applicable at certain places for certain times? Are we that type of Muslim that believes in parts of the faith and reject the other parts? if that is the case then you are not a Muslim - because you have not understood the Qur'anic verse that reads that one must fully submit to Islam.

I vehemently agree that it should be implemented, because I am academically convinced that the law is suitable in Malaysia and because it has overwhelming crime-prevention appeal, but it should be implemented with the concurrence of the special majority in Parliament. If that cannot be achieved, not only Hudud, but any amendment to the Federal Constitution cannot be made - such as amending the Constitution to accommodate Pak Lah's special 'Reform Bills'. It is technically impossible! at least in the present time!

So DAP should calm down. Thus far, the mere mention of Hudud sends an automatic objection from DAP. PAS and a substantial amount of Muslims in PKR agree that Hudud should be applied; but it is 'technically impossible' in the present time until such time that the non-muslims agree for it to be implemented. How can that scenario be achieved? when these non-muslims understand and want it to be enforced! This is because a special majority (that is 2/3 of the total MPs in Parliament) require that the non-muslims themselves to agree for it to be done. Can it be achieved in the present time with the slanted and disgustingly distorted view of Islam in the minds of these non-muslims? of course not! not in the present time! not at the present mindset!

To MCA, Gerakan and MIC, challenge UMNO and see for yourselves whether they are obligated by Islam to enforce Hudud. I am confident that you are in for a rude awakening!